Mumias East MP Peter Salasya has mocked Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna, suggesting his position in ODM is uncertain.
In a social media post on Monday, he described Sifuna as a “tenant without a lease” and urged him to exit before being restructured out quietly, pointing to shifting political narratives and alleged internal party dynamics.
“Sifuna my brother, this is your final boarding call! ODM is not your home, it’s a waiting room and your name is already being called,” he wrote.
Salasya went on to question Sifuna’s standing within the party, implying that his influence is limited despite his high-profile role. “You thought you were inside the system, kumbe you’re just a visitor being shown around by wenyewe,” he said.
In a further jab, the MP compared key ODM figures to landlords, suggesting that Sifuna lacks real authority within the party hierarchy. “Orengo and Babu are the landlords, “You are just a tenant without a lease.” he added.
The remarks appear to reference Siaya Governor James Orengo and Embakasi East MP Babu Owino, both influential figures within ODM.
Salasya's remarks come amid Sifuna's removal as Secretary-General of the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) in February 2026 following a National Executive Committee (NEC) resolution citing “indiscipline” and conduct deemed harmful to party cohesion.
The ouster followed internal tensions, with Sifuna openly opposing sections of the party leadership and criticising political alignments, including alleged moves to support President William Ruto.
In response, Sifuna rejected the decision, terming it “illegal” and “unprocedural,” arguing he was neither informed of allegations nor given a hearing.
He moved to the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal (PPDT) to challenge the removal, escalating the dispute into a legal battle.
Despite the fallout, Sifuna maintained defiance, continuing political activities and aligning with a faction of ODM leaders opposed to the party’s new direction, highlighting deepening divisions within the party.
MP Salasya also issued what he described as advice to the embattled Senator, urging him to leave the party before being pushed out. “Advice is free, leave now before you are ‘restructured’ out quietly,” he said..
He further claimed that shifting public opinion signals a changing political landscape. “Facebook trends don’t lie, “The narrative has completely changed.” he wrote, suggesting that online discourse reflects waning support for Sifuna.
The MP warned that delaying an exit could damage the senator’s political standing. “Don’t wait to be swallowed whole, walk out with the little dignity remaining,” he added.
While Salasya’s comments were laced with humour, they point to underlying tensions and perceived divisions within ODM, one of Kenya’s major political parties.
His remarks also reflect the increasingly public nature of political disputes, with leaders using social media platforms to air grievances and shape narratives.
The post comes amid broader speculation about internal dynamics within ODM, although no official statement has been issued regarding any potential changes affecting Sifuna’s role or membership.
Salasya’s intervention adds to the intensity of political discourse surrounding party loyalty, influence, and leadership structures.
By characterising ODM as a “waiting room,” he suggested that some members may lack permanence or security within the party.
His framing of internal power dynamics with “landlords” and “tenants”, reaffirms perceptions of hierarchy and control, hinting at possible struggles over influence and decision-making.
Despite the tone, the message carries a pointed warning about political survival and timing. Salasya’s call for Sifuna to exit “before you are ‘restructured’ out quietly” suggests that internal party processes could be used to remove individuals without public confrontation.
The remarks may also resonate with ongoing debates about party discipline and dissent, especially as political alignments continue to shift.
Neither Sifuna nor ODM officials have publicly responded to the comments.
Salasya’s post highlights how internal party matters are increasingly playing out in the public sphere, often through direct and personalised messaging that blends satire with serious political signalling.